March 20,
2003
Alley of the
Damned Bosnia, Tortured by
Irrational Ideas
"Bosnia is a
country of hatred and fear." - Ivo Andric,
1920
It will soon be eleven
years since Bosnia was recognized as an independent state, yet it has
never functioned a single day as such. Most of its Croats have long since
taken Croatian citizenship, and feel comfortable only in the sliver of
land where they form a majority. Its Serbs have never truly accepted it as
their country, and agreed to its existence only because the 1995 Dayton peace agreement offered them little choice ? and a territorial autonomy. Only
the Muslims, who have even taken the moniker of 'Bosniaks' (and are
commonly called 'Bosnians', to perpetuate the confusion), persist in the
illusion of statehood and independence, though it is as far from reality
today as it was in 1992.
Bosnia is occupied by a small NATO force and
governed by an Imperial viceroy ? currently a washed-out British
politician ? with powers the ancient
absolute monarchs would envy. Throughout Bosnia, statism reins supreme;
there are no safeguards of liberty or property rights, political
correctness runs rampant, and individuals are seen as servants of the
government, not the other way around. Oh, the rhetoric is all of 'human
rights' and 'justice,' but there isn't a trace of either in most of what
transpires there daily.
"Bosnia challenges any definition of 'nation',"
wrote a Canadian reporter in a recent story on his hometown's peacekeeper
regiment. The Canadians' commanding officer summed it up as, "a nearly
dysfunctional government of three ethnic groups in two entities comprising
one country."
This is a refreshing bit of honesty amidst a
severely twisted picture of Bosnian reality promoted both by the local
leaders and the omnipresent Imperial interests. In case of the latter,
their manipulations go far beyond Bosnia's petty
disputes, all the way to the current effort to justify the unjustifiable
in Iraq.
Pandering by Proxy
In November 2001,
Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen proposed to the
Bush regime to appease Muslims worldwide ? irritated by the "war on
terrorism" ? by going after Serb leaders accused of genocide against the
Bosnian Muslims. Someone must have taken his advice, because efforts to
"bag" the military and political leaders of Bosnian Serbs always spike
during a major crisis in US-Islamic relations (such as, for example, His
Most Democratic Majesty's determination to invade Iraq simply because he
wants to). These efforts are usually an exercise in brute force, intended not so much
to seize the alleged war criminals as to intimidate the local population
and ? more importantly ? their political leaders into submission.
Osama bin Serb?
Three weeks ago, the
Viceroy and NATO's stormtroopers have launched another manhunt for the
former Serb Republic president Radovan Karadzic. This time, they went
after his alleged "financial and support
network," by seizing the property of two
prominent Serbs and threatening others. NATO troops also raided municipal
offices in Pale, the Parliament in Banja Luka, and even the Army command,
carrying away boxes of documents.
All this talk of 'networks' and 'supporters'
most likely deliberately invoked the images of Al-Qaeda and the still
un-captured Bearded One, just as Cohen had suggested 18 months ago.
Language also reveals the ham-fisted and bullying approach of Bosnia's
occupiers to the entire operation. Namely, the two Serbs singled out for
'special treatment' are "linked to" or "alleged associates" of Karadzic,
who "allegedly led a network" which was "widely regarded" to support him
financially. All this passive-voice and guilt-by-assumption/association
indicate that neither NATO nor Viceroy Ashdown actually have any proof
better than local rumors that either man is actually connected with
Karadzic.
This kind of intimidation tactics are in line
with what former commander of NATO forces in Bosnia, Gen. Sylvester,
promised last year. Karadzic himself protested it as extortion, in an open letter to his supporters in Serbia.
Though his protests may well have been selfishly motivated, that does not
make his point any less true: The New World Order really does not care
about the means used to achieve its supposedly noble ends. Truth is, the
means are the ends. It defies all reason to claim one is for
law, human and property rights in Bosnia, then proceed to violate all of
them in the name of "bagging" people accused of war crimes.
Confusion in Court
Around the same time as
the Karadzic hunt, Bosnia's Human Rights Chamber ruled that the Bosnian
Serb government had to pay nearly $2 million in damages
over the "Srebrenica massacre," and conduct "a full, meaningful, thorough
and detailed investigation" into what happened.
The investigation the court demanded is
desperately needed, both to establish the truth of events and to stop the
use of Srebrenica as a political 'bloody shirt'. However, as with all
judicial efforts at social engineering, this one creates as many problems
as it intends to solve. For instance, the damages are not to be paid to
the actual families of the missing, but to the Potocari Memorial
Foundation, a political tool of the Muslim nationalist SDA party. The Foundation's
goal is not to establish the truth, promote healing or even obtain
justice, but to erect a monument to the SDA's twisted version of
history.
Another problem is the investigation. When the
Serb Republic government published the first volume of its official report
last year, it was condemned by both Muslims, Imperial envoys and western NGOs, because it
challenged their enshrined preconceptions. Several Muslim plaintiffs have
already said they "doubted the Serb authorities would ever provide
them with the truth." One is tempted to wonder if the result of the
mandatory investigation will be ruled acceptable only if it is
tailored to fit the official line. After all, everyone knows what
happened in Srebrenica ? or acts as if they do, anyway. Why ask a question
to which one already assumes the answer? It's a strange way to champion
the truth, indeed.
'Tolerance' Exposed
The uncomfortable truth
is, NATO and the Empire really couldn't care less about war crimes. If
they did, they wouldn't commit them so
easily. As with everything else in Bosnia, the issue of Karadzic and
General Mladic is not about truth and justice, but about politics and
power.
Consider General Mehmed Alagic, seized in 2001 by the Hague Inquisition on charges of
war crimes. At the time, the 'Tribunal' was fending off accusations of
anti-Serb bias. The allegations soon subsided, and Alagic and his fellows
were quickly provisionally
released.
Alagic was a Corps commander during the war,
first in central, then in southwestern Bosnia. His first command, the
Third Corps, included many mujahideen. His last, the Seventh Corps,
took part in the mass ethnic cleansing of Serbs from western Bosnia in the
fall of 1995. In a command structure that could only be described as
feudal, Alagic answered directly to Alija Izetbegovic. Before he could
have mentioned any of this at his 'trial,' the 58-year-old Alagic
died on March 8, supposedly of a heart attack.
There has to be a certain irony in the fact
that the Empire likens Karadzic and Mladic to Osama bin Laden, while the
Bearded One's fellow ideologue reaps the benefits. For Izetbegovic is an
avowed Islamic
fundamentalist, a militant
totalitarian who not only never renounced his 1971 "Islamic Manifesto,"
but reaffirmed it in 1990 and thereafter. This is the same man who lied
effortlessly to Western observers that his goal was a multi-ethnic,
tolerant Bosnia, while simultaneously recruiting mujahideen and
purging the Bosnian Army (and society) of non-Muslims. The extent to which
his abuse of coexistence and 'citizen society' poisoned inter-ethnic
relations in Bosnia is inestimable. Yet his lies are still regarded as
obvious truth, and the Empire has never charged him with any crime. He
wasinvestigated in the fall of 2001, but those efforts were apparently
dropped after 9-11.
Heart of Darkness
Because Empire's
perceptions in Bosnia have been at odds with reality, the Dayton peace
agreement provided for a schizoid construction that both insisted the
Serbs were evil and protected their rights, and favored the Muslim
"moderates" while condemning their militant fundamentalism. As a
consequence of this paradoxical approach, Bosnia ended up torn between
four competing visions. Izetbegovic wanted a Muslim-dominated Islamic
state, where others would be second-rate minorities. Karadzic wanted a
separate Serb republic and 'population exchanges' with the remaining
Muslim and Croat lands. The late Croatian president Franjo Tudjman desired
Bosnia wholly or partially annexed to Croatia, sans the Serbs and
with Muslims if need be. And the Empire decided that Bosnia was to be made
into a nation of "Bosnians," who would subscribe to politically correct
values of liberal democracy, crony capitalism, 'human rights' and (of
course) absolute obedience to the Emperor.
Neither of these visions makes for a decent
future, and all four together are a recipe for disaster, as the state of
affairs in Bosnia today amply demonstrates. As one of the Canadian
peacekeepers mentioned earlier said, it is a country with a "culture of victimhood and
dependency." Corruption, murder, theft, extortion, lies, hatred ? these
are the demons that rule Bosnia today, not 'war criminals' or some phantom
'lack of democracy.' Compared to it, the bleak prison yard of Ivo Andric's
"Alley of the Damned" seems downright cheerful.
Hatred and Healing
Andric both loved and
hated Bosnia, a conflict that drove him to write beautiful, tortured prose
for which he won a Nobel Prize. His Travnik
Chronicle (also known as Bosnian Chronicle), The Bridge on the
Drina and other novels are worth more
than all the drivel written by quasi-'experts' over the past decade. Most
of them deal with Bosnia's Ottoman past, when it was known as the 'dark
vilayyet (province)'. Perhaps that is why the Muslim authorities
find him absolutely politically incorrect, and their court intellectuals
have even accused him of
'genocide'.
In a 1920 letter to a friend, Andric wrote that Bosnia was a land where
goodness of the heart and nobility of character were suffused with fear
and hatred. He concluded the letter with this description:
"Whoever lies awake at night in Sarajevo
hears the voices of the Sarajevo night. The clock on the Catholic
cathedral strikes the hour with weighty confidence: 2am. More than a
minute passes (to be exact, seventy-five seconds ? I counted) and only
then with a rather weaker, but piercing sound does the Orthodox church
announce the hour, and chime its own 2 am. A moment after it the tower
clock on the Bey's mosque strikes the hour in a hoarse, faraway voice, and
that strikes 11, the ghostly Turkish hour, by the strange calculation of
distant and alien parts of the world. The Jews have no clock to sound
their hour, so God alone knows what time it is for them by the Sephardic
reckoning or the Ashkenazi. Thus at night, while everyone is sleeping,
division keeps vigil in the counting of the late, small hours, and
separates these sleeping people who, awake, rejoice and mourn, feast and
fast by four different and antagonistic calendars, and send all their
prayers and wishes to one heaven in four different ecclesiastical
languages. And this difference, sometimes visible and open, sometimes
invisible and hidden, is always similar to hatred, and often completely
identical with it."
This hatred, this great darkness in the hearts
of Bosnian peoples, it cannot be defeated by force, or by lies. Only the
truth holds any hope of redemption. There may be places and people even
truth can't redeem any more, however horrifying the thought. But if it
works for Bosnia, it may yet work anywhere.
–Nebojsa
Malic |