Nathan,
I apologize if you get this twice, but I don't think it made it to the list,
so I'm rewriting and sending again.
Anyway, I am proposing a heuristic on heuristics, to innovate innovation,
create creativiity, solve the problem of problem solving, or answer the
question of the question. I see the answer to all of these as one answer.
That said, knowledge creation and questioning, which are intertwined, are
only a fragment of the larger list of knowledge interactions which is the
'design' or system. These include:
- Knowledge storagememory and recollectionamount stored equals
intelligence
- Learning and instruction
- Ignorance
- Knowledge creation (includes innovation, creativity, invention, problem
solving, and theory)
- Exposure
- Compilation
- Language design
- Collaboration, sharing and connectivity
- Expression and non-expression
- Questions and anti-knowledge (cumulative questions antithetical to
knowledge)
As we are soon to leave the 'information age,' we've gotten quite good at
things like storage and retrieval. Here of late we've gotten much better at
collaboration, sharing, and connectivity as a society. But areas like
knowledge creation and questioning receive little or no attention.
As such, I'd submit that one can't understand the whole 'design' or system,
without understanding all of its component parts. We understand this
knowledge working system today in a very lopsided way and to move on to
singularity, we need to understand how interactions like knowledge creation
and questioning fit into the larger system of knowledge working.
Kind Regards,
Bruce LaDuke
Managing Director
Instant Innovation, LLC
Indianapolis, IN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hyperadvance.com
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Nathan Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [singularity] Re: Intuitive limits of applied CogPsy
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:21:26 -0500
Bruce LaDuke wrote:
In other words, a full understanding of questions and knowleddge creation
is
the step required to realize 'artificial knowledge creation,' which is
singularity. Within the construct of these interactions, 'artificial
intelligence' already exists as knowledge stored and recalled artificially.
I can see the artificial aspect in that and how artificial
intelligence in the technical sense could be viewed as overly
specific.
Now I would say that your general concern with questions seems like a
heuristic about being better with heuristics. With regard to
artificial knowledge creation, perhaps that's only part of a design
process. The design process, then, could be a facet of yet a more
involved engineering project. We would still grant that sometimes new
concepts, or new artificial knowledge designs, are so advanced that
it's nowhere near obvious that they wouldn't be extremely valuable in
a so-called more accountable project in the unforeseeable future.
In any case, Bruce, perhaps you'd agree we should leave room for at
least one more step â unless the above is what you already had in mind
and we only needed to reconcile on semantics.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
