Tom McCabe wrote:
-...
To quote:
"I am not sure you are capable of following an
argument"
If I'm not capable of even following an argument, it's
a pretty clear implication that I don't understand the
argument.
You have thus far made no attempt that I have been able to detect to
justify the precise number that you used. And it was a very precise
number. It wasn't a statement of "in the large majority of cases",
which might well have been defensible.
I would have said that you don't appear to *chose* to follow the
argument. In either case, it renders debating with you of dubious
utility. If you didn't raise so many interesting points I would
probably consider you a troll. As it is, my suspicion is that you have
no grounding in statistics or other math which includes probability theory.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=9719180-755b1a
