Can be found at http://www.saunalahti.fi/~tspro1/objections.html .
Answers the following objections: 1: There are limits to everything. You can't get infinite growth 2: Extrapolation of graphs doesn't prove anything. It doesn't show that we'll have AI in the future. 3: A superintelligence could rewrite itself to remove human tampering. Therefore we cannot build Friendly AI. 4: What reason would a super-intelligent AI have to care about us? 5: The idea of a hostile AI is anthropomorphic. 6: Intelligence is not linear. 7: There is no such thing as a human-equivalent AI. 8: Intelligence isn't everything. An AI still wouldn't have the resources of humanity. 9: It's too early to start thinking about Friendly AI 10: Development towards AI will be gradual. Methods will pop up to deal with it. 11: "Friendliness" is too vaguely defined. 12: What if the AI misinterprets its goals? 13: Couldn't AIs be built as pure advisors, so they wouldn't do anything themselves? That way, we wouldn't need to worry about Friendly AI. 14: Machines will never be placed in positions of power. Constructive criticism welcome, as always. -- http://www.saunalahti.fi/~tspro1/ | http://xuenay.livejournal.com/ Organizations worth your time: http://www.singinst.org/ | http://www.crnano.org/ | http://lifeboat.com/ ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=57731183-712c7d
