My earlier attatchment did no go through as the file was too big for this distribution list.
I have posted the document at http://communities.msn.com/SIPSIG (click on the documents link) for feedback.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sudheer Dhulipalla
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 12:24 PM
To: 'Henning Schulzrinne'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SIP bake-off planning
regarding test scenarios:
as part of the SIP-SIG efforts, we have a first draft of the document that describes a few basic interoperability test scenarios. We would like to evolve this document further, so that it can be used as a reference at the bakeoff events.
a preliminary draft is enclosed with this mail, please send any comments to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), so that I can revise this document further.
specifically, I am looking for feedback on the following:
- any call flow issues in the scenarios mentioned in this document
- new scenarios that need to be added to make the document complete
thanks, sudheer
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 5:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SIP bake-off planning
Based on a suggestion and experience at the last bake-off, it might make
sense to get together a group of people for doing a bit more advance
planning of the technical aspects of the next bake-off, in particular
since the bake-off organizer is not a SIP implementor. What I'd like to
do include:
- identify test scenarios and participants ahead of time, rather than by
PA system at the event...
- classify participants into groups, as in Chicago
- set up a torture test station for "weird" messages (*)
- set up a basic message flow test, as in INVITE-200-ACK (*)
(*) One could argue that folks should do these ahead of time, since they
don't really need a bake-off and not passing these just wastes the time
of other, better-prepared participants. Maybe there should be an
informal commitment to at least pass these before signing up?
These are only random suggestions, so I'd welcome your input. However,
at this time, I'd particularly like to assemble a group of people that
can serve as the "technical program committee" for the event.
Comments?
Henning
--
Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs
