sip-implementors  

Messages by Date

• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Behaviour on receipt of second non-2xx Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Iliff, Tina
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Byron Campen
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Adam Roach
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Byron Campen
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Nasir Khan
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Gilad Shaham
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header KASTURI Narayanan \(kasnaray\)
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Byron Campen
• 2007/06/06 [Sip-implementors] Behaviour on receipt of second non-2xx Rupela, Ravi
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Gilad Shaham
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Ivar
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Vishal Mathur
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Ivar
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/06/06 [Sip-implementors] Behaviour on receipt of second non-2xx response SHIV SINGH
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Frank Shearar
• 2007/06/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Ivar
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/06/05 [Sip-implementors] Early dialog BYE, no Contact header Ivar
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] Are separate CSEQ headers maintained by eachuser agent in a dialog? Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Adam Roach
• 2007/06/05 [Sip-implementors] Are separate CSEQ headers maintained by each user agent in a dialog? Tim Hynes
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] About how to deal with REGISTER re-trans Jeroen van Bemmel
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
• 2007/06/05 [Sip-implementors] About how to deal with REGISTER re-trans Lun Tong
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Joe Stone \(joestone\)
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario nithya kumar
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
• 2007/06/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Prabhakaran, Manikantan
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario PRIYA
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Dan Wing
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves
• 2007/06/04 [Sip-implementors] Proxy acting as UAS -- CANCEL scenario Iliff, Tina
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Dan Wing
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Dan Wing
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Randell Jesup
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests Jeroen van Bemmel
• 2007/06/04 [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Randell Jesup
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] call-id in register Sarkar, Uttam
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] call-id in register Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/06/04 [Sip-implementors] call-id in register sumanth achar
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/06/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/06/03 [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests Dale . Worley
• 2007/06/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Comments about: http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=769 Dale . Worley
• 2007/06/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification about the loop detection in RFC 3261 Dale . Worley
• 2007/06/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] handling of 4xx responses by a B2BUA Dale . Worley
• 2007/06/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] UA receiving AOR in INVITE Request URI Dale . Worley
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] ptime/Maxptime supportin SDP Srinivas .
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] ptime/Maxptime supportin SDP Srinivas .
• 2007/06/01 [Sip-implementors] Fwd: b2bua Supported: header Xavier Marjou
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] UA receiving AOR in INVITE Request URI Sarkar, Uttam
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] UA receiving AOR in INVITE Request URI Manivannan S, TLS-Chennai
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] UA receiving AOR in INVITE Request URI Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua Supported: header Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] handling of 4xx responses by a B2BUA Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/06/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] UA receiving AOR in INVITE Request URI Sarkar, Uttam
• 2007/06/01 [Sip-implementors] UA receiving AOR in INVITE Request URI Manivannan S, TLS-Chennai
• 2007/05/31 [Sip-implementors] b2bua Supported: header Ivar
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] handling of 4xx responses by a B2BUA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] ptime/Maxptime supp ortin SDP Manpreet Singh
• 2007/05/31 [Sip-implementors] handling of 4xx responses by a B2BUA Rishabh Garg
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip offer-answer in session modification anurag gupta
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] ptime/Maxptime supportin SDP kaushik
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Via header "maddr" parameter question Yong Xin
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Via header "maddr" parameter question Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip offer-answer in session modification Arun Punj (WD/EUS)
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Comments about: http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=769 Nasir Khan
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip offer-answer in session modification Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] ptime/Maxptime support in SDP Manpreet Singh
• 2007/05/31 [Sip-implementors] Via header "maddr" parameter question Yong Xin
• 2007/05/31 [Sip-implementors] Clarification about the loop detection in RFC 3261 Punnagai Mannan
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip offer-answer in session modification Arun Punj (WD/EUS)
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] sip offer-answer in session modification Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/31 [Sip-implementors] sip offer-answer in session modification anurag gupta
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Please clarify this query......... Khairunnisa Hassanali
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Comments about: http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=769 Ivar
• 2007/05/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Comments about: http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2007/05/31 [Sip-implementors] Comments about: http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=769 Ivar
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Ivar
• 2007/05/30 [Sip-implementors] ANI for inbound PRIVATE call - calea Yeager, Charles
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE after CANCEL & 200 Nasir Khan
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] BYE after CANCEL & 200 OK Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/05/30 [Sip-implementors] BYE after CANCEL & 200 OK P Raj
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Ivar
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Rayees Khan
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Darshan Bildikar
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Ivar
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/05/30 [Sip-implementors] b2bua and PRACK Ivar
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] re-IUNVITE and forking Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] re-IUNVITE and forking Ivar
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] Request without Supported: timer header. Attila Sipos
• 2007/05/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] re-IUNVITE and forking Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/05/30 [Sip-implementors] Request without Supported: timer header. SHIV SINGH
• 2007/05/29 Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: Diversion Header Jackson, James
• 2007/05/29 [Sip-implementors] FW: Diversion Header Siva M-Q16748
• 2007/05/29 Re: [Sip-implementors] re-IUNVITE and forking Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
• 2007/05/28 [Sip-implementors] re-IUNVITE and forking Ivar
• 2007/05/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Please clarify this query......... Mahipati Deshpande
• 2007/05/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Jeremy King
• 2007/05/28 [Sip-implementors] Please clarify this query......... SHIV SINGH
• 2007/05/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] [simple] Should presence server allow a long expiration time of subscription? Vikram Chhibber
• 2007/05/27 [Sip-implementors] [simple] Should presence server allow a long expiration time of subscription? Jeffrey
• 2007/05/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC2833 packets are played on the received end point Brian West
• 2007/05/27 [Sip-implementors] MSRP stack implementation Kobi Shkop
• 2007/05/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] Invite Server Transaction Bug 769 Nasir Khan
• 2007/05/26 [Sip-implementors] RFC2833 packets are played on the received end point Hari Vuppaladhadiam
• 2007/05/25 Re: [Sip-implementors] Invite Server Transaction Bug 769 Dale . Worley
• 2007/05/25 Re: [Sip-implementors] Invite Server Transaction Bug 769 Nasir Khan
• 2007/05/25 Re: [Sip-implementors] Invite Server Transaction Bug 769 Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/25 [Sip-implementors] Invite Server Transaction Bug 769 Nasir Khan
• 2007/05/25 [Sip-implementors] Using SIP instead of CAMEL Daniel Galvao
• 2007/05/25 [Sip-implementors] Invalid URI scheme in record-route sumanth achar
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC dialog 2xx retransmit wait time Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Jerry Yin
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC dialog 2xx retransmit wait time Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC dialog 2xx retransmit wait time Ivar
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Jerry Yin
• 2007/05/24 [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Juan Fco Lopez
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC behavior when receivingmalformed provisional responses Sarkar, Uttam
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Race condition -- CANCEL and 2xx indresh singh
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC dialog 2xx retransmit wait time indresh singh
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC dialog 2xx retransmit wait time indresh singh
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC behavior when receiving malformed provisional responses Andrea Rizzi
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Offer answer with multipart/mixed Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC behavior when receiving malformed provisional responses Ivar
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC behavior when receiving malformedprovisional responses Frank Shearar
• 2007/05/24 [Sip-implementors] UAC behavior when receiving malformed provisional responses Andrea Rizzi
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Sarkar, Uttam
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Offer answer with multipart/mixed Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content-Length Ivar
• 2007/05/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Content-Length Kannaiyan
• 2007/05/24 [Sip-implementors] Content-Length sumanth achar
• 2007/05/24 [Sip-implementors] Offer answer with multipart/mixed shweta kavishwar
• 2007/05/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? Joegen E. Baclor
• 2007/05/23 [Sip-implementors] B2BUA - Contact header? George AK
• 2007/05/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] Race condition -- CANCEL and 2xx Goutham M
• 2007/05/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] Race condition -- CANCEL and 2xx Ivar
• 2007/05/23 [Sip-implementors] Race condition -- CANCEL and 2xx Justin Lu
• 2007/05/23 [Sip-implementors] UAC dialog 2xx retransmit wait time Ivar
• 2007/05/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Request and Response Match Naresh R
• 2007/05/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Request and Response Match Dale . Worley
• 2007/05/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Request and Response Match Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/05/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about Caller ID Kumar, Hemanth
• 2007/05/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the VIA header mandatory in all request messages Diego B
• 2007/05/21 [Sip-implementors] Request and Response Match Naresh R
• 2007/05/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the VIA header mandatory in all request messages Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/05/21 [Sip-implementors] SIP AS - service provisioning Juan Fco. López Colmenarejo
• 2007/05/21 [Sip-implementors] SIPP Scripts Eduardo Martins
• 2007/05/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact matching in registration Rayees Khan
• 2007/05/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact matching in registration Siddhartha Bhakta
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the VIA header mandatory in all request messages Diego B
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Offer-Answer Dale . Worley
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the VIA header mandatory in all request messages Dale . Worley
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact matching in registration Dale . Worley
• 2007/05/18 [Sip-implementors] IMS original dialog-id - usage after IFC processing Arunachalam Venkatraman \(arunvenk\)
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact matching in registration Stephan Steiner
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact matching in registration Rayees Khan
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Does anyone know multicast? (was RE: RFC3264offer/answer - multicast) Steve Langstaff
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Does anyone know multicast? (was RE: RFC32 64 offer/answer - multicast) Punj, Arun
• 2007/05/18 [Sip-implementors] Contact matching in registration Stephan Steiner
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Does anyone know multicast? (was RE: RFC32 64 offer/answer - multicast) Punj, Arun
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Does anyone know multicast? (was RE: RFC3264 offer/answer - multicast) Attila Sipos
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Does anyone know multicast? (was RE: RFC 3 264 offer/answer - multicast) Punj, Arun
• 2007/05/18 [Sip-implementors] Does anyone know multicast? (was RE: RFC 3264 offer/answer - multicast) Attila Sipos
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] ptime/Maxptime support in SDP Kannaiyan
• 2007/05/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] ptime/Maxptime support in SDP Gaurav Kheterpal
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ptime/Maxptime support in SDP Kannaiyan
• 2007/05/17 [Sip-implementors] RFC 3264 offer/answer - multicast Attila Sipos
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK and UAS dialog Ivar
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ptime/Maxptime support in SDP Manpreet Singh
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK and UAS dialog Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK and UAS dialog Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Offer-Asnwer Rayees Khan
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the VIA header mandatory in all request messages kaiduan xie
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Offer-Asnwer Bala Neelakantan
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK and UAS dialog Ivar
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK and UAS dialog Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the VIA header mandatory in all requestmessages Attila Sipos
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the VIA header mandatory in all requestmessages Gaurav Kheterpal
• 2007/05/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK and UAS dialog Ivar
• 2007/05/17 [Sip-implementors] Queries Regarding UAC Behavior ( with reference to Session Timer RFC 4028) Suganya . Doraiswamy

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]