Hi Seng Kee,
U seem to be correct.
I went through the part of the draft u have mentioned. Ofcourse this header
is an optional part of the message.
U need to notice onemore thing, in page 112, table 6 it is mentioned that
Registrars must understand Accept headers.
but it is still not clear whether all these must headers it should maintain
in its database & respond with these headers when queries come.
Please keep me updated incase u get a better clarification,
regards,
Shetti
Tan Seng Kee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/22/2001 10:36:35 AM
To: Shrinivas Shetti/HSSBLR
cc:
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Accept Header usage in Register Request
-- Help
Hi Mr Shrinivas Shetti,
In the rfc2543bis-draft-02 page 37, Table 4, Accept is an optional header
for REGISTER message. If Accept header has no role in REGISTRATION process,
then why is it included in the REGISTER message?
Thank you.
Seng Kee
At 09:35 AM 2/22/01 +0530, you wrote:
>Hi Seng Kee,
>It is apparent from the draft standard that, Accept header has no role in
>REGISTRATION process, Its meaningful for the UAC to UAS communication.
>REGISTER meant only for registering the contacts, which can be used for
>redirection, forking if colocated with proxy, etc.
>regards,
>Shrinivas Shetti
>
>
>
>
>Tan Seng Kee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/22/2001 06:51:55 AM
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: (bcc: Shrinivas Shetti/HSSBLR)
>Subject: [Sip-implementors] Accept Header usage in Register Request --
> Help
>
>
>
>
>Hi,
>I would like to know what is the use of Accept header in the REGISTER
>request, as there is no any visible usage during registration process.
>
>Thank you.
>Seng Kee
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sip-implementors mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
