Hi,

Thanks for your answer
But if there is no port information,
how can I register with To header with port?
For example,

 REGISTER sip:159.226.1.3 SIP/2.0
   Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 159.226.1.1
   From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5010
   To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5010       
   Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   CSeq: 1 REGISTER
   Contact: <sip: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5010>
   Content-Length: 0

I don't know how bis09 defined.
But in this case,how can register know the wanted port of the inviter if I can't use 
port information?
>From Via?

Thanks
luoqiang
__________________________________________________________
address of ua1 -> Contact
But, response path is Via header.
As bis09, From and To don't accept port.

        t:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
            ==>  t:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

khlee

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of luoqiang
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] A basic sip question


Hi,


I am a beginer for sip.
After reading the rfc,I have some questions.
e.g:
ua1:  sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
ua2:  sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061
when ua1 call ua2,the message would be:

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061 SIP/2.0
     v:SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.1.1
     f:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
     t:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
     i:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
     m:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061
     c:application/sdp

Suppose there are no proxies between them.
The message should be forworded to ua2 and ua2 should send a 180 response.
But where does  the ua2 get the  adress of ua1?
Via?From?Contact?
I was puzzled after reading the rfc,because it seems that all above headers is correct.
Which is the ua2's chioce?

Thanks!

luoqiang

    
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors 
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to