It should be different. -Prasanna Jamkhandikar, Sunil wrote: >Sorry I did a mistake in framing the question, the question is should >the To-tag for the 200 OK be same as initial one or different than >initial one. > >Thanks, >Sunil > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Jamkhandikar, Sunil >Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:22 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about ETSI Test case execution. > > > >Hi all, > >There is an ETSI Test case which says > >"Ensure that the IUT having already received a 2XX final response to its >INVITE request, on receipt of a Success (200 OK) response, with a >different Record-Route as in previous response, but with the same Via >branch parameter and CSeq header method as in the INVITE request, sends >an ACK request with a Route header set according to this new >Record-Route." > >My doubt is should the second 200 OK have the same branch parameter as >the initial 200 OK had or should it have a diff branch than the initial >200 OK (forked response). > >If the test case has to be executed with diff branch parameter, does the >ETSI Test case hold true for the 2nd 200 OK response having branch same >as the initial 200 OK. > >Thanks, >Sunil > > > >"This email message and any attachments are confidential information of >Starent Networks, Corp. The information transmitted may not be used to >create or change any contractual obligations of Starent Networks, Corp. >Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of >any action in reliance upon this e-mail and its attachments by persons >or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are >not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately -- by >replying to this message or by sending an email to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- and destroy all copies of this message >and any attachments without reading or disclosing their contents. Thank >you." >_______________________________________________ >Sip-implementors mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > >_______________________________________________ >Sip-implementors mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > > >
_______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
