On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 11:24 +0530, King Jeremy wrote: > Is the magic cookie "z9hG4bK" in the "Via" branch parameter value case > sensitive or case insensitive? RFC 3261 ABNF defines the branch > parameter as "token". In addition, the description states, "Unless > otherwise stated, tokens are case-insensitive" and section 7.3.1, > "Header Field Format" corroborates this. I've been doing comparisons > in a case-insensitive way. Should the magic cookie comparison be case- > sensitive?
Good catch! But as the characters are intended to be a magic flag that (by chance) has never been used by an RFC 2543 implementation, and that the characters are quoted in mixed case, I'm sure the intention is that it is case-sensitive. Dale --- interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
