The issue is tracked by bug 661. http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=661
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Dale R. Worley > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 9:43 AM > To: Sip-Implementors > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Is the "magic cookie" in the > Viabranch case-sensitive? > > > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 11:24 +0530, King Jeremy wrote: > > Is the magic cookie "z9hG4bK" in the "Via" branch parameter > value case > > sensitive or case insensitive? RFC 3261 ABNF defines the branch > > parameter as "token". In addition, the description states, "Unless > > otherwise stated, tokens are case-insensitive" and section 7.3.1, > > "Header Field Format" corroborates this. I've been doing > comparisons > > in a case-insensitive way. Should the magic cookie > comparison be case- > > sensitive? > > Good catch! But as the characters are intended to be a magic > flag that (by chance) has never been used by an RFC 2543 > implementation, and that the characters are quoted in mixed > case, I'm sure the intention is that it is case-sensitive. > > Dale > > --- > interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability > test server > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
