Joegen E. Baclor wrote: > Hi Manju, > > Thanks for the response. Yes I know that the proxy would be able to > properly route the response. However being able to deliver the response > is not really the concern of my question. In the case of a 200 OK > response to an INVITE, the UAC needs to know the Record-Route to be able > to properly contruct succeeding requests within the dialog. How would > the UAC be able to construct the Route Set without the Record-Route in > the response?
Consider the scenario where there are several record_route headers present in the response, but the one inserted by your proxy is missing. How should the proxy know at which location the missing REcord-Route header should be inserted? I think the proxy has to rely that the UAS behaves correct. regards klaus > > Joegen > > Manjunath Warad wrote: > >> Hi Joegen, >> Proxy shouldn't bother about the Record-Route in the response. >> No need to insert Record-Route in response. Response traverses in >> the network using Via header. >> >> Rgds, >> Manju >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joegen E. >> Baclor >> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:45 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding Record-Route >> >> >> Hi, >> >> If a proxy record routes and the response it gets does not contain the >> record-route, what should be the correct behavior of the proxy. Should >> it insert the record-route before relaying the response? >> >> Joegen >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
