On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 12:18 +0800, Joegen E. Baclor wrote:
> Thanks, I totally agree with your explanation.  I think it is obvious 
> that my real intention is to make sure that the proxy receives the BYE 
> which brings me to the next (dirty) alternative.  Modify the Contact 
> header in the INVITE and replace it with the proxy's address before it 
> goes down the path.  If the proxy can cache the original Contact header 
> and use it to route suceeding messages, would that be an allowable option?

What are you trying to accomplish?

If the UAs obey the standard, the proxy only needs to add a Record-Route
for itself.

Are you worried about interoperating with UAs that do not obey the
standard?

Dale

--- 
interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to