On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 08:13 +0200, Frank Shearar wrote: > "Paul Kyzivat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So my conclusion is that if a UA receives a 423 response to a register > > request, and it chooses to reattempt the register request, it SHOULD use > > a value consistent with the 423 in the subsequent register request AND > > in any subsequent refreshes to that registration. > > > > Does this seem right? > > Yes, it does. It's probably better for a registration to last slightly > longer than necessary in the interests of decreasing network traffic and the > overhead in creating sockets, etc. than for a registrar to have to cope with > loads of UAs hitting it with REGISTERS that it'll just 423 anyway. > > I don't think it'd be necessary to maintain the registrar's preferred value > in the UA across reboots, mind you. Or the UA could, from time to time, > re-register with its (smaller) preferred value, just to see if the registrar > will now accept the smaller value. (Perhaps the registrar's under much less > load now, and adjusted its desired minimum value accordingly.)
Both of these seem quite reasonable. Dale --- interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
