Comments inline...

Thanks,
Nataraju A B

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:sip-implementors-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Wu
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:00 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Re-transmitting of ACK for RE-INVITE after
a
> newre-invite
> 
> 
> Hi all,
>    RFC 3261 Section 14.1 said... "The rules for transmitting a
re-INVITE
> and for generating an ACK for a 2xx response to re-INVITE are the same
> as for the intital INVITE". Consider the following re-invite scenerio
> 
>  A                        B
>    ---- RE-INVTE (cseq 1) --->
>    ---- RE-INVTE (cseq 1) --->   /* re-transmission */
> 
>    <------ 200OK (cseq 1) ------
>    ----- ACK (invite 1) --->
> 
>     ---- RE-INVTE (cseq 2) --->
>    <------ 200OK (cseq 1) ------ /* response to the first
> re-transmission re-invite */
>   <------ 200OK (cseq 2) ------
>     ----- ACK (invite 1) --->    /* should the ua reply the ACK for
the
> re-transmission  200 OK within 64*T1? */
>    ----- ACK (invite 2) --->
> 
> My question is "should the ua reply the ACK for the  re-transmission
> 200 OK within 64*T1"?  Thanks in advance.
> 
[ABN] 3261 is very clear about this statement... 

<<3261 , sec 13.2.2.4 2xx Responses
   The UAC core considers the INVITE transaction completed 64*T1 seconds
   after the reception of the first 2xx response.  At this point all the
   early dialogs that have not transitioned to established dialogs are
   terminated.  Once the INVITE transaction is considered completed by
   the UAC core, no more new 2xx responses are expected to arrive.
/3261>>

Probably the bug here would be that, 2nd RE-INVITE (cseq 2) been tried
to send out before the 64*t1 time duration lapsed after first 2xx for
re-INVITE (cseq 1). 

> Richard Wu
> ASTRI
> 
> 
> This message (including any attachments) is for the named
addressee(s)'s
> use only. It may contain
> sensitive, confidential, private proprietary or legally privileged
> information intended for a
> specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are
not
> the intended recipient,
> please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system,
> destroy any hard copies of it
> and notify the sender. Any use, disclosure, copying, or distribution
of
> this message and/or any
> attachments is strictly prohibited.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to