It may be a virus or some technical problem, but I think I have seen this mail 8 times in the last 20 minutes????
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:55 PM To: Manpreet Singh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Putting Record route in the responses Please remove me from this list immediately! -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Manpreet Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Could someone point me to the part of the spec which talks about what > all headers are to be inserted in all the response to an INVITE or any > other request. I am bit lost trying to find the right explanation. > > I am specifically looking for a case where a proxy inserts a > Record-Route header in the outgoing invite and the UAS rejects the > INVITE with some 5xx or a 4xx response. Now would the 4xx or 5xx > response carry the R-R headers from UAS to the proxy and then back to > UAC? I have generally seen the implementations where 100 doesnt carry and 18x carries it. > > thanks > > Manpreet _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
