Two interpretations are around for Re-invite without SDP. 1) Return the Currently Negotiated SDP which is recv only 2) Treat that as a new SDP negotiation and return the full capabilities (with send-recv etc).
I think the second option is more generic. Kasturi -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip-implementors] INV without sdp Hi ALL: I'm a newbie of sip implementation. Here is a question about invite request without sdp. After Caller A and Callee B construct a dialog, A sends a re-invite request with sdp indicates "sendony" to hold B. B responses 200 OK with sdp indicated "receonly" correctly. If at this moment, A sends a re-invite again but without sdp, how does B response in sdp? sendrece? receonly? Is there any sections in any RFCs defines the behavior described here? Thanks you all. BR, Johnny _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
