It is just not supposed to be enforced by the recipient at all.
Paul
Jeroen van Bemmel wrote:
>> The receiver typically should not try enforcing the "increase by
>> exactly 1" rule. I mention this because prior hops might have
>> rejected a prior request. Thus the cseq gap might subsequently be
>> larger than 1 when it reaches subsequent destinations.
>
> Is there any value in trying to enforce "increase by not too much" (say 70,
> i.e. allowing for 70 hops each challenging the request)?
>
> Jeroen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
