Alan Crosswell wrote: > Hello, > > Has there been a replacement functionality for the expired > draft-ietf-sip-privacy Remote-Party-ID header in 18x responses to > INVITEs? This is used, e.g. by Polycom hard phones, to indicate the > Called Party name back to the Calling Party. Perhaps the To header in > the 18x reply is edited by a B2BUA to implement this? > > Thanks. > /a
You might want to look at RFC3325, which offers a similar function under certain circumstances. Regards, Michael Procter _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
