On 1/2/07, Rohit Sonalkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It does not say whether the receiver should treat as invalid the > following combinations in the new offered SDP: > > 1. Different SDP, same version number
The spec seems clear on this one, as you yourself stated. It violates condition #1 in your message. So, I'm confused ... why do you suggest that it's unclear? As for the appropriate way to reject the offer, I would suggest sending a 400 Bad Request response. The reason phrase should clarify the nature of the syntax error. > > 2. Same SDP, different version number > Granted, this one is a little less clear, but a precise reading would seem to indicate that this is not an error condition. I don't see where it explicitly disallows incrementing the session version, but keeping the same SDP. I'm sure someone will correct me if I've missed a key phrase somewhere. I would expect the answerer to dutifully construct an equivalent answer. Hope that helps. -- Gary Cote www.awardsolutions.com _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
