Thomas Leseney wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> Yes this is a correct behavior. The contact expires parameter indicates 
> how long the UA would like the registration to be valid.
> 
> The registrar takes this value as a suggestion but it may have a local 
> policy and is allowed to either reduce this value (the selected value is 
> indicated in the 200 response) or reject the registration if the 
> suggested value is too short.
> 
> It seems your registrar is configured with a maximum expiration value of 
> 60.

Setting a very small value like this is a trick that a registrar, or an 
SBC in front of a registrar, may do in order to force frequent 
reregistrations that can keep a path open through a NAT or FW.

You might want to explore configuration options that minimize this if it 
isn't needed in your case.

        Paul

> Regards,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> how long the UA would
>            like the binding to be valid
> 
> how long the UA would
>            like the binding to be valid
> 
> 
> Vick, Steven wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> In 3261, it states
>>
>> "If the field value has an "expires" timer, that value MUST be taken as
>> the requested expiration."
>>
>> But, further on, it states the proxy MAY choose an expiration less than
>> the requested expiration interval. 
>>
>> I am trying to resolve a problem, and I am hoping you can help. 
>>
>> My gateway sends an expiration timer of 900 seconds, and I do see it in
>> the following the contact info. But the proxy ALWAYS changes it to 60
>> seconds. Is this correct (legal)?
>>
>> Thanks, and by the way, this has been an excellent source of information
>> for me. I appreciate everything you do to maintain this forum. As a
>> rookie, it's helped me tremendously. Cheers!
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>  
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to