[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ahh, I see. Is this true of all Channel Banks connected through T1? I 
> am less concerned about fixing my testing environment as in making 
> sure the program works in as many customer environments as possible. 
> If I have to rule out this fairly common environment, it would be too 
> bad (though not the end of the world).
>

Honestly, I am not 100% sure if this is generally true for all channel 
banks but in my experience,  I yet have to see an FXO device that 
handles call answer supervision properly.


> I definitely don't want to go the DSP route: 
> http://www.3amsystems.com/wireline/tone-search.htm scares me.
>

You need not go this path.   I am sure there are open source DTMF 
decoders lying around.  

Here's a good example

http://cvsup.pt.freebsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/i4b/dtmfdecode/?only_with_tag=MAIN#dirlist

>
>
> joegen-at-opensipstack.org joegen-at-opensipstack.org |SIP 
> Implementors| wrote:
>> Bruce,
>>
>> It's not not asterisk.  T1->Channel Bank does produce an early seize 
>> signal.  Your best bet would be to use a tone analyzer to detect the 
>> ring back in-band in your announcement UA.   This will be quite a 
>> daunting task because you will need to deploy different sets of tone 
>> detection for the different frequency used in different countries.  
>> My advise, get rid of the channel bank and use T1 all the way.
>>
>> Joegen Baclor
>>
>> Bruce Atherton wrote:
>>> Actually, my setup is a Sangoma T1 card connected to an Adtran 750 
>>> channel bank with some FXO ports. But you are right that the whole 
>>> pathway is controlled by Asterisk.
>>>
>>> Dale.Worley wrote:
>>>  
>>>>    From: Bruce Atherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>    That is really good news. So the problem must just be with 
>>>> Asterisk,    which happens to be the PBX I am testing with. I will 
>>>> take the issue up    with the developers there.
>>>>
>>>> Oops, my mistake -- IIRC, you might be using a Digium PSTN interface
>>>> board, plugged into the Asterisk host.  In which case, everything
>>>> regarding the PSTN interface is driven by the Asterisk code.  But I
>>>> assume the Asterisk developers know all about that, and any
>>>> idiosyncrasies it has.
>>>>
>>>> Dale
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>>>       
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to