Hi Sanjay, What if the proxy is mandated to record route? ( if it needs to be on on path, for subsequent requests where we need to do a NAT traversal etc). With Regards Raghu
On 2/15/07, Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the operation fails, then have the proxy not add Record-Route header, > that way proxy will not see subsequent requests on that dialog > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >raghuram gangi > >Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:22 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by > >Proxy Server > > > >Hi All, > > > >I have an application where in I need to store some > >information from 2xx responses for an INVITE on to a > >persistent store. If this operation fails, proxy server will > >not be able to serve the user for subsequent requests in the > >same dialog. RFC 3261, doesn't allow proxy to modify the 2XX > >Responses for an INVITE transaction. What should be the ideal > >behavior of Proxy in handling such scenarios? > > > >With Regards > >Raghu > >_______________________________________________ > >Sip-implementors mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
