http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sip/draft-niemi-sip-subnot-etags-02.txt

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>Vikram Chhibber
>Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 2:18 AM
>To: Sip-Implementors
>Subject: [Sip-implementors] Distinguishing SUBSCRIBE refresh 
>and full-statequery???
>
>As per RFC 3265 (SIP-Specific Event Notification), NOTIFY sent 
>in immediate response to a SUBSCRIBE contains full state information.
>Furthermore, if the SUBSCRIBE is for a Resource List, (RFC 
>4662), this NOTIFY contains full state information for the 
>Resource List with RLMI and state information. Due to this, 
>the size of NOTIFY request may become very large. The RLS may 
>break this large NOTIFY into number of partial NOTIFY 
>requests. In any case, there is always a lot of processing at 
>the RLS end.
>
>Do we have a mechanism by which the watcher can tell the RLS 
>whether a SIP SUBSCRIBE refresh is for querying the full state 
>or just to refresh the subscription duration?
>We do have distinguish PUBLISH refresh and PUBLISH update.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>~Vikram
>_______________________________________________
>Sip-implementors mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to