I don't regard myself as a "sip person" so I can not vouch for what exists. But the question appears odd. INAP is obviously IN whereas base SIP is for session control, so the notion of mapping does not make sense unless someone wanted to write extension messages to achieve this. But even that does not sound a great idea. Encapsulation of INAP in a SIP message would make more sense. I'm not sure if someone has done that. Normally if you want to transport INAP over IP, you would use M3UA or SUA from the SigTran suite.
Rergards Lee On 06/03/07, amit rehalia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any efforts or documents describing mapping > between: > > 1) "INAP operations to SIP messages and vice-versa" > 2) "INAP operation's parameters to SIP message's > fields > and vice-versa" > > I couldn't find any draft or rfc for the above. > > regards, > Amit > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new > http://in.answers.yahoo.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping > This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP > Use [email protected] for questions on current sip > Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
