Neel, Thanks! Yes, I am aware of RFC 4244. Can you point me in a direction in which I can find out approximately how many vendors support Diversion header and how many support RFC 4244? Also, do you have any idea as to if there is any momemtum by vendors to deprecate support of Diversion header and replace it with History-Info? Do you think it will be a mixed bag of implementations for a while?
Thanks, Tina Iliff -----Original Message----- From: Bala Neelakantan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:14 PM To: Iliff, Tina; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Status of Diversion header The diversion draft seems to be de-facto standard and many products do have support for it. But, the Diversion draft has expired and the preferred approach is History-Info. You may want to look at RFC 4244. Thanks, Neel > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:sip-implementors- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iliff, > Tina > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Status of Diversion header > > What is the current status of the Diversion header? Has there been a > new draft or RFC since raft-levy-sip-diversion-08.txt? > > Thank you, > Tina Iliff > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
