This is permitted to give a chance to crashed end-points to 
re-create state from a mid-dialog request such as re-INVITE to 
refresh the call. This is clearer from Section 16.6: Step 4.

"The proxy will remain on the path if it chooses to not insert 
a Record-Route header field value into requests that are already 
part of a dialog. However, it would be removed from the path 
when an endpoint that has failed reconstitutes the dialog."

Regards,
Siddharth


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Quan
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 5:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Record-Route in dialog

Quick query from 3261 section 12.2 "Requests within a
Dialog"..<<SNIP>>Requests within a dialog MAY contain Record-Route and
Contact header   fields.  However, these requests do not cause the
dialog's route set   to be modified, although they may modify the remote
target URI.   Specifically, requests that are not target refresh
requests do not   modify the dialog's remote target URI, and requests
that are target   refresh requests do.<<END>>Since the routeset is
already established, why would the Record-Route headers be allowed in
new requests?-will
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to