> > However it seems to be possible for a buggy remote party to send an > SDP answer with G729, PCMU and telephone-event. In this case it turns > out to be that the offerer should always examine the received SDP > answer doubtfully. >
Why do you say this is an invalid answer? Is it because of the presence of G729? RFC 3264 says that the answerer may include codecs that were not present in the original offer. So ... what's the problem, exactly? Am I missing something? -- Gary Cote www.awardsolutions.com _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
