Hi Dale,

Perhaps I am wrong, but my intention was to highlight cases that are
shown in RFC 3312. 


regards
Rayees
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 3:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Early-media

   From: "Rayees Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   It is not always the case. In case there are offer-answer exchanges
with
   PRACK and UPDATE before 200 OK is sent, having SDP in 200 OK same as
183
   is not a good idea. 

Perhaps it is a bad idea, but it is *required* -- SDP sent in a
provisional response must be duplicated in the final response (if it is
a success response).

Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT   The information contained in this e-mail any
attachments is intended only for the named recipient and may be
privileged or confidential.

If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately 
on +44 (0)1908 425000 and do not disclose, copy, distribute 
or take any action based on the contents of this e-mail. 

You should understand and accept that, when communicating with us
by e-mail, it is not a totally secure communication medium.

We accept no liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss
arising from any action taken in reliance on the information contained
in this e-mail and give no warranty or representation as to its accuracy
or reliability.

DIGITALK has the facility to monitor and read both incoming
and outgoing communications by e-mail.  In line with industry efforts
to reduce the proliferation of Un-Solicited SPAM messages, 
DIGITALK uses various methods including Reverse-DNS 
lookups and ban-lists to prevent malicious content reaching our users.

This message and any attachments has been scanned for known
viruses. However, we would advise you to ensure the content is
indeed virus free.  We do not, to the extent permitted by law, accept
any liability (whether in contract, negligence or otherwise) for any virus
infection and/or external compromise of security and/or breach of
confidentiality in relation to transmissions sent by e-mail.

VAT No: GB 876 3287 81. Reg No: 3080801
Place of Registration: England
Registered Office Address: 2 Radian Court, Knowlhill, Milton Keynes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------"


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to