Hi Mustaq,
    200 Ok response of any request contains method name in Cseq request 
of  which it is responding.....

-- 
Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be 
wrong.....

Ravi Rupela
Software Engineer
EliteCore Technologies



Mushtaq Ilyas wrote:
> RFC 3261
> "While a CANCEL request is handled in a stateful proxy by its own   server 
> transaction, a new response context is not created for it.   Instead, the 
> proxy layer searches its existing response contexts for   the server 
> transaction handling the request associated with this   CANCEL.  If a 
> matching response context is found, the element MUST   immediately return a 
> 200 (OK) response to the CANCEL request.  In   this case, the element is 
> acting as a user agent server as defined in   Section 8.2.  Furthermore, the 
> element MUST generate CANCEL requests   for all pending client transactions 
> in the context as described in    Section 16.7 step 10."
>
> Yes CANCEL is a distinct transaction but with same response context as the 
> INVITE it is cancelling?
> The problem however is that using thesame response context causes an 
> abnormality is the state-machine.
>
> UA Client         Proxy Server    
> ================================
> ---->Invite
>                           <==180
> ---->Cancel
>                           <==200
>                           ---->Cancel
>                                                  <==200 or 487 (SIP Proxy 
> Server or UA Server)
>
> How would one identify that the 200 is for the Invite or Cancel?
>
>
> Regards
> Mushtaq Ilyas
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Ryan Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, 28 April, 2007 11:34:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel part of Invite transaction?
>
> My mistake -- CANCEL is a distinct transaction (RFC 3261 sec 9.1).  The cseq
> value is used to match up on the INVITE that's being cancelled.
>
> For reverse compatibility with RFC 2543, the UAS may or may not send a 487
> (request terminated) response to the cancelled INVITE.  I suspect this may
> be the source of confusion -- with only a single 200 OK response for the
> cancel you might guess there's only 1 transaction.
>
>   




_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to