I have a different question.
An RFC 2543 re-INVITE could have just a From tag, just like an RFC3261 INVITE. So, how to distinguish between an RFC2543 re-INVITE and an RFC3261 INVITE? Regards, Attila -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of chozhan A Sent: 01 May 2007 04:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'sip implementors' Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2543: INVITE vs re-INVITE Hi, Does RFC 2543 says initial INVITE MUST NOT have from tag or is it optional Thanks/Regards AC Bala Neelakantan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the original INVITE there will be no From and To Tags. In the Re-INVITE there will be a To Tag. Thanks, Neel > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sip-implementors- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chozhan A > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 2:54 AM > To: sip implementors > Subject: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2543: INVITE vs re-INVITE > > Hi all, > > If the Caller and Callee both are 2543 end points. > How to distinguish between INVITE and re-INVITE at a proxy(transaction > stateful) that establishes the call between them and record routes. > > Regards > AC > > > --------------------------------- > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Yahoo! Messenger > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors --------------------------------- Check out what you're missing if you're not on Yahoo! Messenger _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
