http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=682
My 2 cents, Gaurav > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sip-implementors- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Jayakumar > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:25 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Reg RFC 3261 -Register Message > > Hi all, > In RFC 3261 under section 10.2.4 it has been specified that the > 200 ok response from a registrar may or may not have a expires parameter > in > the contact header. And in Section 10.3. 8 it has been said that the 200 > ok > from a registrar MUST have a expires parameter in the contact header. > > > > When we consider these two statements both are contradictory. Can any > one please tell me which out of these two statements should we consider as > correct? > thanks, > Jayakumar > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
