I think Padmaja's hinting that the proxy has inserted those 3 Vias the first time itself, before it could spiral it 'out' and receiving it back. If the proxy had spiralled it out, there would be other proxies's Vias as well.
Care to clear this Padmaja? --- On Fri, 6/13/08, Scott Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Scott Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Proxy forwarding invite with multiple via > headers > To: "padmaja venkata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Date: Friday, June 13, 2008, 11:18 AM > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 16:38 +0530, padmaja venkata wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the reply. I, however, use only one proxy > and that single proxy > > has inserted 3 via headers of its own. Please see the > Invite from the UA and > > the corresponding Invite forwarded by the proxy below. > My question again is- > > Is it OK to have more than one Via headers inserted by > a single proxy? Is it > > defined in RFC? > > Yes, it's ok. The proxy in question 'spiraled' > the request (sent the > request through itself) in the course of processing it. > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
