On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 07:58 -0700, Benjamin Jacob wrote: > I think Padmaja's hinting that the proxy has inserted those 3 Vias the > first time itself, before it could spiral it 'out' and receiving it > back.
The proxy in this case is the sipXecs proxy, which sometimes spirals messages through itself directly; in his configuration for that address, twice. In this particular case, the problem actually appears to be that the branch parameter in some of those interior Via headers has a '%' character in it - the receiving system is upset by that (I'm not at all clear on why implementors find it necessary to parse anything but the topmost Via). We've seen this on a couple of other implementations as well, and have changed that to a '$', which is legal in a token. > If the proxy had spiralled it out, there would be other proxies's Vias > as well. True. -- Scott Lawrence tel:+1.781.229.0533;ext=162 or sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sipXecs project coordinator - SIPfoundry http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipXecs _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
