Both are valid. BTW, Display name need not always be a quoted-string. It could be a set of LWS-separated tokens (with no DQUOTs).
Regards Satya T -----Original Message----- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:08 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs. I cannot easily tell from 3261 whether references to URIs other than the Request URI must be encased in "<" and ">" or not, probably because I do not know how to read BNF. In other words, in the absence of a display name (which would be a quoted string), is this valid? Contact: sip:xx.xxx.xx.xxx:5060 What about this? To: sip:xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 I was under the impression it was not, but this is mainly because I've never seen any implementation NOT use that notation regardless of whether it is necessary. I do not know if the rules here are more or less strict than RFC 2822. Thanks! -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
