That is a shame indeed.. :( On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> wrote: > El Miércoles, 18 de Noviembre de 2009, Brez Borland escribió: >> Thank you all, it is clear to me now. >> >> Quick look at 5626. The new spec is big. > > Too big, too complex and too late IMHO. > I still wake up every day asking myself how SIP protocol was born assuming > there is no NAT... :( > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >
_______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
