Playing RBT on receipt of 181 (Call is being forwarded) or 182 (Call Queued)
does not seems a good choice since 181/182 does not give any indication
whether call has been placed to called party and called party is ringing. I
would prefer playing Routing Tone or some sort of local announcement. RBT
should be played only when called device is ringing.
I believe that gateway should get 180 Ringing (after 181 Call is being
forwarded) when called mobile phone starts ringing and RINGING message is
received from GSM network. Once this occurs, then only RBT should be played.

Best Regards,
Vivek Batra

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Sunita
Bhagwat
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 4:49 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Sunita Bhagwat
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Ringback on SIP 181 Call forward / 182 Queued

Hi all,
I'd like to know if a SIP gateway receiving a 181 (Call is being forwarded)
or a 182 (call Queued) from SIP peer should play local ringback towards the
originating endpoint (say PSTN/ISDN). RFC 3960 mentions early media and
ring-back only when a 180 Ringing is received. However I'm seeing a customer
scenario involving a Microsoft OCS network forwarding calls to cell phones
and sending a 181 to the gateway - expecting the originating gateway to play
a ringing tone to calling party.
I think it makes sense to play ringing tone and be prepared to play inband
media if received, but such a scenario does not seem to be covered in rfc
3960.
Appreciate your inputs.

Thanks,
Sunita
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors


Email Scanned for Virus & Dangerous Content by : www.CleanMailGateway.com



_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to