Not entirely true. A & B can talk using both G729 and PCMA. Either one
can switch between these two codecs without the use of a reINVITE.

-Arun

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Aneesh Naik <aneesh.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>      This will not be allowed. A (UAC) has sent all the codecs it supports,
> and B (UAS) has respoded with the codecs it is willing to talk to A for this
> call. Only one codec will be negotiated for media transfer between A and B.
> In your example below, the negotiated codec is G.729, so both the parties
> must send media on G.729 codec.
>
> If the codec needs to change it between, then there can be a Re-NVITE to
> change the codec, and both parties once aggreed will start talking on that
> new codec negotiated.
>
> Thanks,
> Aneesh
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Michael Hirschbichler <
> s...@hirschbichler.biz> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In my specific test-case, client A sends an INVITE offering some codecs
>> and client B answers with a 200OK containing a subset of these codecs.
>> Is it allowed for client B to transmit media using a codec presented in
>> the offer of client A but not acknowledged in the answer of client B?
>>
>> e.g.:
>>
>> client A sends:
>> INVITE
>> m= G726, G729, G723, PCMA, PCMU
>>
>> client B responses:
>> 200OK
>> m= G729, PCMA
>>
>> the resulting media-exchange:
>>
>> A====G729====>B
>> A<====G726====B
>>
>> is this allowed? Must A accept the G726-media?
>>
>> BR and thx in advance
>> Michael
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to