> It is indeed number 4; I think the text in the draft is fairly clear on > that point. > > Neither 2 or 3 would be 'within the .invalid DNS TLD', and number 1 is > not "a domain name within the .invalid DNS TLD'.
Thanks for the response since I wanted to be sure that the example shown with the following thread was an invalid attempt to use "invalid" per draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition (even if IP6 was used). "c=IN IP4 .invalid" http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg06981.html _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
