On 2/10/16 1:38 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
From a methodological point of view, I am curious:
If the 'lr' parameter has a value assignment, is UA B truly justified in
ignoring the route set categorically?
Or is that one of those things where behaviour for improperly formed tokens is
undefined?
The latter.
You could have various kinds of implementations:
- strict ones, that reject the message as ill-formed
- forgiving ones, that try to keep things going as best they can
in the face of errors (perceived or real)
- naive implementations, that work ok for well formed messages,
but that assume messages are well formed and fail to even notice
certain kinds of mistakes and act in ways that depend on
the random idiosyncrasies of their implementation.
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
