How response will be sent for response ?

UA received 200 OK for INVITE which is sent out ,* but 200 OK received is
with different call-id (wont match the context)*

On 31 July 2017 at 21:07, Asim Sulaiman <asim.sulai...@emircom.com> wrote:

> Dear Prakash,
>
> I guess you will get 481 transaction does not exist.
>
>
> Regards,
> Asim Sulaiman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
> Prakash
> K
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 7:27 PM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for
> INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in
> context"]
>
> What would be the behavior of UA when 200 OK received which is not matching
> the dialog
>
> "200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"
>
>
> I see the following snippet in RFC 3261 which says UA should create dialog.
> Wont this end up in acknowledging the hacking?
>
>   If the dialog identifier in the 2xx response matches the dialog
>    identifier of an existing dialog, the dialog MUST be transitioned to
>    the "confirmed" state, and the route set for the dialog MUST be
>    recomputed based on the 2xx response using the procedures of Section
>    12.2.1.2.  *Otherwise, a new dialog in the "confirmed" state MUST be
>    constructed using the procedures of Section 12.1.2.*
>
>
> does this mean UA should generate ACK & immediately followed by BYE should
> be triggered?
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Prakash K
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Disclaimer :
> This e-mail message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally
> privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the
> original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message,
> please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient
> acknowledges that EMIRCOM, as the case may be, are unable to exercise
> control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the
> information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that
> any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and
> no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the
> sender does so expressly with due authority of EMIRCOM. Before opening any
> attachments please check them for viruses and defects.
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Disclaimer :
> This e-mail message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally
> privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the
> original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message,
> please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient
> acknowledges that EMIRCOM, as the case may be, are unable to exercise
> control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the
> information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that
> any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and
> no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the
> sender does so expressly with due authority of EMIRCOM. Before opening any
> attachments please check them for viruses and defects.
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Prakash K
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to