Hi ! What do you think about incrementing the version in SDP o-line, but not changing anything else in SDP, should such a behavior be accepted or should it be rejected ?
RFC 4028 states that such behavior at least should be avoided, but is that true also for UA without support for timer ? " RFC 4028 - Session Timer In that case, the offer MUST indicate that it has not changed. In the case of SDP, this is accomplished by including the same value for the origin field as did previous SDP messages to its peer. The same is true for an answer exchanged as a result of a session refresh request; if it has not changed, that MUST be indicated. " An example from reality in picture below, should it be accepted ? I think it should be accepted. [cid:image001.png@01D5D11B.59A78290] BR/pj Sensitivity: Internal
_______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors