When did they get introduced? Seems odd that we got them added when no
one is quite sure what they mean.
-Jonathan R.
Dean Willis wrote:
We have these two milestones in our charter, and neither Keith nor I are
exactly sure what they mean:
Mar 2007 Guidelines for use of SIP security to WGLC (Informational)
Jun 2007 Guidelines for use of SIP security to IESG (Informational)
Now we all know that there is a substantial need to better document the
usage of and relationships between the many SIP-related security
mechanisms, but I'm not aware of having seen a document posted that is
making any headway on this problem,. and I'm not even sure we have a
consensus on exactly what needs to be done.
Plus, we've definitely missed the milestones.
So I'd like to propose that we delete these milestones for now, and
bring them back only when we have a concrete proposal on the table for
what we think we can actually do (and should do) here.
Opinions?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 600 Lanidex Plaza
Cisco Fellow Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
