Dean Willis wrote: vkg> It looks like the drafts and a substantive body of the work in vkg> this area is out there; just needs to be organized for a more vkg> amenable deadline. But, I may be mistaken...
Otherwise said, you think the milestones in question were essentially made redundandt by the adoption of the more-focused drafts?
No; I thought that the focused drafts were *leading* to the milestone. But this may be my mis-interpretation of how a WG is chartered. Is it the case that it is one draft per milestone? Or could a series of drafts satisfy one milestone? If the latter, then sec-flows, sip-sips, sip-certs, domain-certs all go towards fulfilling the to fulfil a general milestone that charters the WG to develop "Guidelines for the use of SIP security."
Or do we need something like a meta or framework document that brings all these pieces together into a more coherent structure?
Doesn't S15 of sip-hitchhikers-guide-03 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-03#section-15) come close to providing some structure to the various security- related drafts? Plus, if sip-hitchhikers-guide is the last document that the WG produces, then it will keep up -- thanks to Jonathan -- with newer technologies (SAML), protocols (DTLS) and documents as they are adopted by the WG. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
