> Do people seriously believe that any amount of protestation > from the IETF is going to prevent implementors from > downgrading? If the receiver(s) really don't want the SIP > method, they don't have to accept them. If they do, then no > amount of hand wringing MUST NOT's is going to prevent the inevitable. > > The only thing this kind of hand wringing is likely to > produce is more incompatibility between the puritans and the sinners.
Doesn't this argue agaist your own previous email? The 480 approach doesn't allow for automatic retry, because you can't figure out from the error code that it might actually work by downgrading. I'm am quite lost at understanding what concrete outcome you want to see. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
