> -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 12:56 AM > > > I'm not convinced by the downgrade argument. The far-end can just as > easily > > send a 3xx redirecting the UAC to the sip contact. Per this new draft > the > > proxies must not recurse on that, and the UAC should inform the user > before > > doing so. But I think a new 4xx response code would be much more likely > to > > make that a reality, as any vendor implementing support for recursing on > a > > 418 would have read the draft and seen where it says "inform the user". > If > > they didn't read the draft, they'd fail the request since they got an > > unknown 4xx response. (compare that to a 3xx, which is known/usable > without > > reading this draft) Am I missing the gist of the concern? > > If they haven't read the draft, failing the request is the Right Thing > to Do.
Yup, that was my point. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
