Yes, I support the plan. > -----Original Message----- > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:41 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip] DTLS-SRTP - more work for the SIP group > > (As WG co-chair) > > You may remember that some time ago some work was identified > that crossed multiple working groups in the RAI area on the > above subject. > Cullen took this ball away and played with it in a RAI BOF > and there came to some consensus on the way forward and what > documentation was required. > > However we now need to put that work through real working > groups to get it to IESG so we are reallocating it to working groups. > > I have requested milestones as follows: > > Sep 2007 Requirements for media keying to WGLC (Informational) > Nov 2007 Requirements for media keying to IESG (Informational) > > This will be WG milestones in support of progressing > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-media-security- > requiremen > ts-04.txt > And incorporating > draft-wing-rtpsec-keying-eval > > This charter item will essentially be a discussion of how we > got where we are now. It is therefore not the most > earthshattering document, but it has been considered valuable > to retain some permanent record and an informational RFC is > the way to do this. > > Dec 2007 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP > to WGLC (PS) > Feb 2008 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP > to IESG (PS) > > This will be WG milestones in support of progressing > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-sipping-media > -dtls-03.t > xt > > This charter item goes to SIP because it is security related, > rather than to SIPPING. This is one deliverable out of a > package of 3, the other two being: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-00.txt > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-mmusic-sdp-dt > ls-03.txt > > Which will be handled by AVT and MMUSIC respectively. > > What do you need to do as SIP WG members > ---------------------------------------- > > Provide consensus or not to move these drafts forward. > > Do you agree with the identified author drafts above forming > the basis of these charter items listed above? If not please > express your objections to the list, with appropriate > technical considerations. > Indications of support are appropriate as well, particularly > if you have a technical point you wish to make (alternatively > address the WG chairs with just "Yes I support"). > > Responses please within a calendar week, i.e. by Tuesday 25th > September 2007, unless there is a feeling that more time and > discussion are needed. > > > Regards > > Keith > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip >
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
