This seems like a sound plan to me. -Ekr
At Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:41:23 +0200, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > > (As WG co-chair) > > You may remember that some time ago some work was identified that > crossed multiple working groups in the RAI area on the above subject. > Cullen took this ball away and played with it in a RAI BOF and there > came to some consensus on the way forward and what documentation was > required. > > However we now need to put that work through real working groups to get > it to IESG so we are reallocating it to working groups. > > I have requested milestones as follows: > > Sep 2007 Requirements for media keying to WGLC (Informational) > Nov 2007 Requirements for media keying to IESG (Informational) > > This will be WG milestones in support of progressing > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-media-security-requiremen > ts-04.txt > And incorporating > draft-wing-rtpsec-keying-eval > > This charter item will essentially be a discussion of how we got where > we are now. It is therefore not the most earthshattering document, but > it has been considered valuable to retain some permanent record and an > informational RFC is the way to do this. > > Dec 2007 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP > to WGLC (PS) > Feb 2008 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP > to IESG (PS) > > This will be WG milestones in support of progressing > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-sipping-media-dtls-03.t > xt > > This charter item goes to SIP because it is security related, rather > than to SIPPING. This is one deliverable out of a package of 3, the > other two being: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-00.txt > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-mmusic-sdp-dtls-03.txt > > Which will be handled by AVT and MMUSIC respectively. > > What do you need to do as SIP WG members > ---------------------------------------- > > Provide consensus or not to move these drafts forward. > > Do you agree with the identified author drafts above forming the basis > of these charter items listed above? If not please express your > objections to the list, with appropriate technical considerations. > Indications of support are appropriate as well, particularly if you have > a technical point you wish to make (alternatively address the WG chairs > with just "Yes I support"). > > Responses please within a calendar week, i.e. by Tuesday 25th September > 2007, unless there is a feeling that more time and discussion are > needed. > > > Regards > > Keith > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
