Forgive me if this question has already been asked but...
In reading this draft over, which is very interesting, I observe that for the case of mutual subscription, it would be much simpler to just disallow the subscribed party to reuse the dialog for the incoming subscription? Thanks, FM -----Original Message----- From: Adam Roach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 3:22 PM To: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) Cc: sip List; Dean Willis Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO: A recap,sense of consensus and a proposal for direction. On 10/25/07 4:12 PM, Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) wrote: > Why does the call need to go away, if INFO is rejected? Isn't INFO not > supposed to affect call state(s)? > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-dialogusage-06.tx t /a _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
