On 10/25/07 4:41 PM, Frank W. Miller wrote:
Forgive me if this question has already been asked but...
In reading this draft over, which is very interesting, I observe that
for the case of mutual subscription, it would be much simpler to just
disallow the subscribed party to reuse the dialog for the incoming
subscription?
Yes. And, with GRUUs, we now have this ability. Absent GRUUs, there was
no way to guarantee that you ended up talking to exactly the same device
without re-using dialogs.
/a
Thanks,
FM
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 3:22 PM
To: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh)
Cc: sip List; Dean Willis
Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO: A recap,sense of consensus and a proposal for
direction.
On 10/25/07 4:12 PM, Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) wrote:
Why does the call need to go away, if INFO is rejected? Isn't INFO not
supposed to affect call state(s)?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-dialogusage-06.tx
t
/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
